Cooper LP800 Guia do Utilizador Página 448

  • Descarregar
  • Adicionar aos meus manuais
  • Imprimir
  • Página
    / 567
  • Índice
  • MARCADORES
  • Avaliado. / 5. Com base em avaliações de clientes
Vista de página 447
16
-
8 Di
g
ital Worst-Case Timin
g
Analysis
Cumulative Ambi
g
uit
y
Hazard
In worst-case mode, simple signal propagation through the
network will result in a buildup of ambiguity along the paths
between synchronization points (see Glitch Suppression Due to
Inertial Delay on page 16-12). The cumulative ambiguity is
illustrated in Figure 16-8.
Fi
g
ure 16-8
Cumulative Ambiguity Hazard Example 1
The rising and falling transitions applied to the input of the
buffer have a 1 nsec ambiguity. The delay specifications of the
buffer indicate that an additional 2 nsec of ambiguity is added to
each edge as they propagate through the device. Notice that the
duration of the stable state 1 has diminished due to the
accumulation of ambiguity. Now, consider the effects of
additional cumulative ambiguity shown in Figure 16-9.
Fi
g
ure 16-9
Cumulative Ambiguity Hazard Example 2
The X result is predicted here because the ambiguity of the
rising edge propagating through the device has increased to the
point where it will overlap the later falling edge ambiguity.
Specifically, the rising edge should occur between 3 nsec and 12
nsec; but, the subsequent falling edge applied to the input
predicts the output starts to fall at 10 nsec. This situation is
called a cumulative ambiguity hazard.
12 89
TPxxMN=1
25912
TPxxMX=3
TPxxMN=1
25912
310
12
19
TPxxMX=7
Vista de página 447
1 2 ... 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 ... 566 567

Comentários a estes Manuais

Sem comentários